Posted on September 27, 2006

On the Fence Over the Wall; Weighing ‘Anchor Babies’

How do you control illegal immigration if some of those guarding the gates are susceptible to bribery and corruption?

ON THE FENCE: With a bill sanctioning a 700-mile border fence cleared by a House majority this week, attention now turns to the upper chamber where the Republican leadership will work against a ticking legislative clock ahead of the midterm elections. Sen. Bill Frist (R., Tenn.), the majority leader, makes the case for the fence legislation — even apart from the “comprehensive reform” package he has supported — in a San Diego Union-Tribune op-ed. “All in all,” he writes, “I’m convinced that the finished network [of fences] would give us the protection we need to achieve what immigration law enforcers all ‘operational control’ over the entire border.” A border fence around San Diego achieved just that, Mr. Frist notes, but the rest of the California border remains largely unobstructed: “Today, one can walk in a more-or-less straight line from Mexico’s Baja California to Riverside without encountering a single physical barrier.”

Meanwhile, a newspaper in Democratic Sen. Patrick Leahy’s home state of Vermont accuses the politician of straddling the fence issue. A double-layered fence extending 700 miles would be “a scar on a fragile desert ecosystem, and a scar on our legacy as a nation of immigrants,” Mr. Leahy argued in a speech on the Senate floor. But, writes Battleboro Reformer reporter Evan Lehmann, “Four months ago, he was on the other side of the fence issue when he supported construction of a barrier along 370 miles of the southwest border. … Leahy voted yes to the shorter fence.”

For National Review editor Rich Lowry, writing an op-ed in the Salt Lake Tribune, the momentum behind the fence is a victory for the Neanderthals — and he means it in a good way. Today’s bipartisan support for the border fence marks a reversal; earlier in the year, when immigrants and their supporters took the streets, “polite opinion scoffed” at the fence in favor of reforms that included a guest-worker program and citizenship for some illegal immigrants. “But a funny thing happened on the way to ‘comprehensive reform’ — the political marketplace worked,” Mr. Lowry says. The Minutemen, with their border vigils, “have shown that Washington can be made to respond to public opinion on immigration, for a change.”

Complete text linked below:

Source:
The Wall Street Journal

Send this site to a friend! (click here)

Leave a Comment

eNews & Updates

Sign up to receive breaking news
as well as receive other site updates!

We will not spam you, or sell, rent, exchange, or otherwise share your email address with a third party.

Monthly Archive

 
NATIONAL POLICY INSTITUTE
P. O. Box 3465
Augusta, GA 30914
Phone 706-736-4884
Fax 706-733-7652
nationalpolicyinstitute.org
E-Mail npi@nationalpolicyinstitute.org

CHAIRMAN

William H. Regnery, II

DIRECTORS

Louis R. Andrews
Lou Calabro
John Gardner
Anthony Hilton

ADVISORY COMMITTEE

(in formation)
Miles Wolpin, Ph.D., J.D.
Anthony Hilton, Ph.D.
James Owens, Ph.D.
Ralph Scott, Ph.D.
Disclaimer
NPI publications are not to be construed as necessarily reflecting the corporate views of the National Policy Institute or as an attempt to aid or hinder the passage of any bill before the Congress of the United States.

The National Policy Institute is classified as a Section 501 (c) (3) organization under the Internal Revenue Code. Individuals, foundations, corporations, and associations may support the educational and research work of NPI through tax-deductible gifts.

The National Policy Institute does not rent, sell, or publicize its contributor lists.
News Releases
Feeds

Of further interest
spacer